Where Reading, Writing & Faith Connect

My wife, H, has multiple shelves of books, an appetite for good stories, and a creative streak in writing. I was curious how these passions relate and what she has learned in both her reading and writing. She sits down with me at her favourite spot for reading – on a corner-couch, which overlooks the front garden.

Her interest in books “came a bit later on in life.” She didn’t get into reading much as a child, even when her homeschool program made her open up “proper novels or novelettes”. However, after her mum suggested crime-fiction writer, Agatha Christie, H learnt to take pleasure in reading.

Not content to merely read fiction, H took it upon herself to write about 70 short stories & draft two novels. I asked her what she think goes into making a good read.

“Planning. (She laughs.) I think you need a good story. You need well-written characters, good conflict. As a writer, I don’t know if I’ve really encapsulated those aspects very well, but it’s something that, in a sense, I’ve tried to do.”

More often that not, she has incorporated truths from the Holy Bible, focusing on one aspect of morality and asking how she might make it teachable or relatable, or “completely wild and out there”. She gives the example of one of her characters who wants to run from God. “No matter where he goes – he even goes to different planets – and it’s like God still finds him there, all the way out on Pluto. Ignoring the fact that there’s no way he’d be able to survive out there. But the point is, he could go anywhere, but he couldn’t escape God’s presence. God always was going to find him.”

H finds writing short-stories works well for her, since she “can get passionate about a particular storyline…I can write something over a few days, and then perfect it a little bit before moving on to the next thing.” And novel-writing holds greater challenges in maintaining “enthusiasm, and memory of what you’ve written and where you’re planning to go”. But she enjoys both.

So what gets H creative?

She gets inspiration from other writers, both on page and on screen. And while she likes fantasy stories and the idea of writing them, she would struggle with “instilling moral or biblical principles” into her own versions. My wife takes her hat off to J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis, both believers and both finding ways to write mythic tales. She even imagines stories based off an “impactful picture of a person” in artwork, and is keen to try writing something “based solely off just a portrait that I’ve seen”.

When I reconnected with H five years ago, I found out she was subscribed to a UK-based magazine called ‘Writer’s Forum’. It folded after a publisher takeover in ’23, but I was keen to hear what H got out of it while it lasted.

“Well, they had a lot of different sections. There were definitely people that would write articles on ways to improve your writing, different exercises you could try. Writer’s Forum actually contained a monthly calendar, where they’d give you a daily challenge. Sometimes they’d just give you a picture of some really random stuff, and you just had to write about the picture. Other times they’d give you a word, and you had to write a poem using that word or variables of that word.”

Another section gave writing prompts through different categories. “So the idea was that you’d roll the dice, and through each row or column…that would tell you what you were to incorporate into a story.”

She really liked one spot called First Draft; it was where readers (mostly) submitted the first paragraph from a book, in which 20 errors had been added. H says, “So for me, that was probably one of my favourite things, just going through that and actually testing how well I could pick up on grammatical errors. It was always really nice if I got 18 out of 20.”

Writer’s Forum also interviewed writers, and, “the writer would actually talk you through what their process is, what environment helps get them comfortable. Every writer has their own little place, which is their writing zone.”

Book clubs can be a good place to meet people and read and discuss interesting publications. H has been part of two. One was of my sister’s making.

H reflects, “I definitely got a lot of value and enjoyment out of [her] book club. For me at that stage in life, it was just good to get out of the house, and mix with some common-sense people. Some of the books we read were Christian-themed or self-help books, books that challenge different aspects of your life, with a few non-Christian fictional books thrown in. So that was just a really nice, relaxed, low-key get-together.”

We now attend one at a library, where we get to meet with a variety of locals. H likes “listening to other people’s opinions and stories that they have to share. Even if it’s got anything to do with the book we’ve read or not, it’s just really fascinating hearing from other people, getting their perspectives.” She does feel a lot of the selections are modern, within 20 years, and don’t stand up to earlier writings. Though she remains hopeful as “there’s been a few standouts that have been really good.”

So what would H say are her go-to author recommendations?

Kate Morton: H has been obsessed for a while. Morton has written seven books in the last 20 years. Well crafted stories. They have elements of tragedy, but also “positive hope for people in the present”. Every story is unique.

Jane Austen: Her books are “gems from the time period”. Austen in her lifetime wasn’t able to appreciate how much people valued her writings as they “weren’t actually published under her name because women authors were frowned upon.”

C.S. Lewis: “Narnian Chronicles in particular”.

Agatha Christie: “How could I forget? My goodness. Queen of fiction.” She has read most of her Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple books, only two of which she personally wouldn’t recommend, ‘Halloween Party’ and ‘Elephants Can Remember’. “The rest are really good.”

Another thing I learnt early on about H was her own annual ritual, “Read a Book Day”. Curious to know more, I asked what led to it’s creation and what it looks like.

“Read a Book Day initially started in 2011, I think. I had about a week before Christmas, I’d gone to Koorong (Christian bookstore) and bought a book by one of my then, favourite authors, which was a romance novel. I got home, and I was super keen to read it, and then I thought, “Ugh.” Like, I was going to have work on the Monday. And I was like, “I don’t want to be in the middle of this and have to go to work.”

“I was living by myself at that stage, and I don’t do Christmas. So it was like, “Well, I’m not going to be going anywhere on Christmas Day. So what I’ll do is I’ll just get through the next week of work, and then I will set aside Christmas Day, and I will just read this book.” I ended up being gifted some chocolates by one of the truck drivers at work. So for Christmas Day, I had a nice little box of chocolates, sat down, ate and read my book, which didn’t actually thrill me as much as I’d hoped it would, but anyway. I had that experience.”

After a three-year gap, she went back to that idea, and remembered how well it went and decided to make it “an annual thing”.

“I would pick a book from an author that I hadn’t read before. It could be an author that I had read some of their books. It just had to be a book that I specifically hadn’t read. Over the years, depending on where I’ve been working, I’ve either been gifted chocolates and wine or both. And so it’s kind of like I’ve always been blessed with these treats, and then I’m just left alone on the day and can just sink my teeth into a book and not feel obligated to do anything else. It’s really just a treat day for myself. Yeah, and it’s a day that I really look forward to.”

I thanked her for sharing. H enjoyed the questions.

?Questions¿ – ‘The Happiest Man On Earth’ by Eddie Jaku

Book Club is back in session, and this month we’ve been reading a memoir about a young Jewish man’s survival from the Holocaust. Eddie Jaku, an author at 100 years old, tells of the loss, but also the life lessons he’s learned, during and post Germany 1939-45. Jaku shared his story at the Sydney Jewish Museum for years, but now in book form he tells us, his ‘new friends’ what happened to him and his family. Winner of the Australian Book Industry Awards’ Biography Book of the Year 2021, this is a personal, heartbreaking and gripping tale.

I’ll use the questions offered by the Good Read’s reader guide. Spoilers abound.

1. What surprised me most about the book?

The storytelling style is very winsome, and he writes as if you are his new friend, willing to hear him out. The content of the book is mostly horrific, but it’s very compelling reading.

I’ll also say, Eddie is a survivor in many ways. When facing death at every turn, he escapes capture or worse through his own ingenuity or with the help of others. I’m sure a lot of people did everything in their power to stay alive in the purge, but I was surprised at how many ways Eddie and others needed to fight for survival. Eddie says, “Thanks to my friend, I survived. We looked after each other. We were cold, we were sick. Many times I said to Kurt, ‘Let’s go [suicide]. What is the point of living, only to suffer tomorrow?’ Kurt refused. He would not let me go to the wire.” The wire was an electrified fence surrounding the camp, and when people lost hope, they would end their lives touching it. Eddie also talked about the need to just focus on the fight to live. Any distraction would sap energy and eventually kill you.

2. How did my opinion of the book change as I read it?

I enjoyed the book all the way through, and as it was short, I did not feel much different about it by the end. However, my opinion of the Holocaust has changed a bit. The absolute depraved way the SS treated their prisoners once again shocked me, but this personal edge to the horror made it all the more real. I knew the behaviour was awful, but the story won’t let me forget it easily now. Eddie shares, as a friend, his terrible, lived experience in two prison camps. It is worth pausing and hearing all he has to say.

3. If I could ask the author anything, what would it be?

Jaku has since passed away, but if I had been able to talk with him, I would have visited the Jewish museum that he frequented and heard him expound on stories and share what he had learned.

4. How does the book’s title work in relation to the book’s contents? If I could give the book a new title, what would it be?

Jaku suffered deeply during his imprisonment. He lost his parents early on and was used and abused, and saw much death. Yet he found that the greatest ironic revenge he could have on Hitler was to get married on Hitler’s birthday, and be truly happy living life to the full. He said that happiness is found in yourself and through others around you. I like the name of the book, but maybe “Jaku’s World” or “Life After Death Camp”?

5. Did this book remind me of any other books?

Thinking about it now, there’s one about an African American who shared his story out of difficult systemic racism called, “Life Is So Good” by George Dawson. He has a similar conversational style. With regard to the content, I’ve read a few books on the Holocaust and Germany at the time, but nothing this personal to the life of a Jewish person in the camps.

6. How did it affect me? Do I think I’ll remember it in a few months or years?

Eddie Jaku lost most of his family and friends to the camps. That loss never left him, and healing only came through releasing his hate and also by love for his first-born. Even after learning about such loss from many stories, it still hits home that we can’t choose what others do to us, but we can choose how we respond and live. I hope to remember his story. I want to cherish the people in my life all the more because of his story. That’s what he’d wish for me.

7. Would I ever consider re-reading it? Why or why not?

Of course! I have to return the book tomorrow, but I did start to re-read it already. It’s an easy, short read, despite all that happens, and Jaku’s perspective is quite unique.

8. Who do I most want to read this book?

I’d give it to anyone, though probably would start at mid-teen and up, age wise, because of the strong themes. Hearing someone’s perspective can push past one’s prejudice about them or their religion or race. So I’d hope people who put Jewish people in one political, racial, or religious basket could read this and rethink their position.

9. Are there lingering questions from the book that I’m still thinking about?

Less questions, more a few statements. Jaku says of Otto von Birmark, first chancellor of united Germany: [He] once warned the world to watch out for the German people. With a good leader, they were the greatest nation on earth. With a bad leader they were monsters.” Jaku claims, “The Germans made a religion of logic, and it turned them into monsters.” Strong words, but he is speaking from experience.

He also says that he doesn’t hate anyone involved in the capture and slaughter, or those who collaborated with them, but he can’t forgive such evil. He believes to forgive Hitler would be a betrayal to the “six million who died. There is no forgiveness. When I say this, I speak for the six million who cannot speak for themselves.”

I cannot claim I’d be able to forgive Hitler if I’d been in his shoes, but I know my God not only commands forgiveness, but also enables us weak humans to do supernatural things. He forgave me all my evil thoughts and deeds I ever did and will do. So as his child I must also forgive those who do evil to me. So, likewise, I would urge my fellow believers to not hold onto hatred for another person. Forgiveness doesn’t mean justice can’t happen at the same time. Jesus took both the Father’s anger at my evil and the punishment I deserved for it. So forgiveness and justice are found at and through the cross of Jesus. Thanks be to God! And thanks for reading.

?Questions¿ – ‘Project Hail Mary’ by Andy Weir

Another book-club book review. This time with…jazz hands!

‘Project Hail Mary’ is a novel by Andy Weir, the famed author of ‘The Martian’. It follows the harrowing, funny & momentous adventures of a science teacher and an engineer trying to save their worlds. Yes, their worlds, because only one of them is from Earth.

Putting the science back into Science Fiction, Andy Weir has created a world that is dying – that is, Sol is dying, and so is every other sun in the known universe. Well, except for one, and six brave astronauts were trained to go there to find out why and what might be done for Earth. Except when the only living human on the ship wakes up, it’s Ryland Grace, a scared nobody who can’t remember what happened. Yet he’s not the only one searching for answers in a galaxy far, far away, and they have more than two arms and legs…

By Andy Weir1

As ever, I’m basing my review on the readers guide provided through our book-club. So expect spoilers!

Was Project Hail Mary what you expected going into it? What surprised you about it?

I was a little intimidated with it being a scientific novel, thinking it would be too much or boring. Yet I really enjoyed the science and found it grounded the story in realism. For instance, Ryland uses fairly basic maths and tools to work out where he is and why he’s there. As the story unfolds, more complicated maths and science is used, but it was explained at a decent level of comprehension, leaving me to enjoy the thrill and fun of the story. I was very happy to have read the novel. It’s low on violence and strong language, which for a mature novel is not always true. I grew up reading some Matthew Reilly and Bernard Cornwell’s military books, which leaned more on the gruesome side of humanity.

What did you think about the character of Ryland Grace? Were you rooting for him? What did you like or dislike about him?

I felt for and cheered Ryland on. I rejoiced at his triumphs and cringed at his setbacks. He seemed quite the optimist, even when things seemed bleak. His companion on the journey needed to give him confidence in certain circumstances, but they supported each other. He also felt things and wept when he needed to grieve. He’s scientifically minded, without being too theoretical or unapproachable.

Did you race to the end, or was it more of a slow burn?

I enjoyed the read quite a lot, so I was not a slow reader. Some chapters that were either explanation heavy or ending in dramatic fashion gave me an excuse to put the book down for a bit.

Which scene has stuck with you the most?

I have more of a feel of the whole story now, not one particular scene, although the ending scene does give some great vibes, with Ryland in his element.

What did you think of the writing? Are there any standout sentences?

Weir writes well. He knows the value of suspense, explaining things, using humour and good characters. He fills out the concept of the story in lots of great ways.

What did you think about the science behind Project Hail Mary? Were you able to understand it, and did you enjoy reading about it? How do you think it contributed to your enjoyment of the story?

I commend Weir for his great efforts at integrating science into his novel. I have not come across such a well-done work. It wouldn’t work for every story, but the science fits in this one. I was able to understand some explanations, but it didn’t really matter as the science flowed into the rest of the story quite well. Having a lot of science in the novel helped with the suspension of belief. It was a world that felt a bit more real because of it.

Would you want to read another book by this author?

I’d be curious about reading and then watching The Martian, seeing as that’s become a popular movie.

If you had to choose someone to be stuck in space with, would you choose Ryland or Rocky?

My skills don’t include scientific know-how, being more of a practical guy (my wife calls me a genius, though, haha). So Ryland could do the science. I would struggle to do anything like what our space friend Rocky is capable of.

What surprised you most about the book?

The fact that most humans can’t agree on pretty much anything – my wife and I disagree on smooth vs. crunchy peanut butter, for one – and yet in PHM, the major powers work together on saving the planet. Obviously it’s a global catastrophe threatening all life, but Weir is interestingly positive about humanity. He brings up survival instinct and the ‘good’ in people. I found it also surprising how often science-teacher Ryland got dragged along for the ride, despite his flaws.

What did you think about the character of Eva Stratt? Did you find her sympathetic as a character? What did you like or dislike about her?

Ms. Stratt was a fun character. She is both intimidating and strangely comforting in her role. She’s determined to get the job done, screw the cost and difficulty. She has to make drastic decisions quickly, but she’s smart enough to trust the experts and wear the burden of responsibility, eventually. She’s not a complete head-case and willing listen to Ryland on occasion. I liked her for getting things done. She was fit for the job, but certainly made some muddy moral choices.

If you could ask the author anything, what would it be?

What was the inspiration behind the book, and how did you create the ‘Rocky-race’ and their technology?

What did you think about Ryland’s determination to get home? Did you think it was cowardly? Selfish? Understandable?

He is determined to get home, but not to the exclusion of everything else. He clearly cares for Rocky and ultimately sacrifices his dreams for the sake of Rocky and his people. Ryland is an everyday person, not hardened by vice or training. He’s relatable and his desire to get home is very understandable.

  1. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/611060/project-hail-mary-by-andy-weir/, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=67657535 ↩︎

A Squealing Truck

The sounds were first was got me up to investigate. Had I heard right? Did a pig just squeal outside my unit? I peered out my door and noticed a road train idling nearby. Occasional similar noises emanated from the trailer, and I realized that I was not hearing one pig alone – over a hundred animals were objecting to their situation.

I have never seen or heard such a phenomenon before. I’ve seen horses, sheep, possibly camels being transported, but not pigs…until now. It was unsettling. They seemed terrified. I tried to look from my position inside to the trailer or to see what the driver was up to, but all I saw was a bit of pink flesh near some air vents.

Soon the truck revved up ad started off again, leaving me stunned. I know pigs and cows are very smart animals, and yet we slaughter them for food. I felt something in me rebel against any easy answer. We need meat to survive, and God gave animals for food back in the days of Adam. Yet I can’t help but feel a sense in which we are failing our role here if we treat such suffering as nothing. It does matter how we look after the world and creatures that God made, and gave us to rule over. Am I becoming a vegetarian in light of this encounter? I’ve yet to decide what I’m going to do exactly, but it’s certainly made me think.

?Questions¿ – ‘The Dictionary Of Lost Words’ by Pip Williams

In June for our book club, we read ‘The Dictionary of Lost Words’ by Pip Williams. It’s a fascinating look into the 70+ year production of the Oxford Dictionary, and the words that got lost or left out along the way. I have been given questions that I will endeavour to use dictionary-approved words to answer. Let’s assume it won’t take me 70 years to do so.

What does The Dictionary Of Lost Words tell us about power?

Power can be used for good or evil. In the making of the dictionary, Murray and his assistants have the power over what words are followed up on or left out. It’s not a vindictive effort, though. The work is often thankless and tedious. However, the protagonist, Esme, at times feels somewhat left out and unwanted, especially as a young girl seen to have been a meddler by one character. As she grows up, there is also the aspect of the women’s suffrage to get the right to vote in the UK. In one instance, those in power (some men who can vote) disrupt a peaceful gathering of suffragettes. Power can be used to serve or control, and both ways to wield it are portrayed in the story.

How do you think not having a mother influenced the trajectory of Esme’s life and her character?

Much has been said about the challenge that face children who grow up without the presence of their father, but the absence of a mother is no less of one. Esme’s dad does his best for her, guiding and comforting her, and yet can’t give her all the attention she needs. When schooling for her becomes necessary, her dad and Ms. Thompson (a family friend) decide on boarding school, and that proves to be an unpleasant experience for Esme. It’s hard to be there for a child when there are so many English words to decide on(!), and Esme is often left to amuse herself. Esme finds friends in Lizzie, a young maid, as well as in the lost words she gathers from the Scriptorium. As she matures, she expands her search for friendship and words at a town-market, a theatre and pub. The choices she makes indicate that she is innocent to worldly ways and also susceptible to them. She relies a fair amount on the friendship of Ms. Thompson, who does her best to ‘mother’ from a distance.

While this book is based on the true events surrounding the publication of the first Oxford Dictionary, Esme herself is a fictional character. Why do you think Williams chose to have Esme grow up on the precise timeline she did?

A lot happens in that space of history in England: the suffragette efforts, war with Germany, along with the production of the dictionary. It really helps to see someone living through those times, which is why the person of Esme is helpful. She gives Williams someone that the real people of that time can interact with and share their lives. Real people from history are fascinating, often more than fictional ones, but they can be helped to come alive through this type of story.

Which scene has stuck with you the most? (Spoilers in this and the next section)

There were a few scenes that stood out to me; Lizzie making friends while Esme recovers and grieves from a parting, the times Esme meets with Mabel, a seller at a market, the quiet, sweet moments in Esme and Gareth’s love-story. Yet the one that probably stands out most is her birthing scene, and all that happened in her giving away her “lie-child”. It’s so poignant, beautiful, sad and hopeful, with a dollop of heart-ache. No mother should have to face the decision of whether or not to give away her child, and so often the child has no choice in the matter.

Is the ending of the book just? Do the characters get what they deserve?

To me, it does seem unfair for Esme to lose her new husband to the war, and then to be struck and killed in mid-age by a ‘lorry’. Do we see a sense of justice in this book? Well, the men of the dictionary are honoured for their service and yet the women are not even invited to the dinner and celebration, though three attend the proceedings from a viewing platform. Some things are not fair, and Williams hopes with this book to right some wrongs, or at least acknowledge them.

Do you think this is a hopeful story? Consider arguments for and against.

It’s a significant achievement to name, identify, define, and order the English language, and these men and women clearly did their best to make it happen. The author is happy to congratulate the efforts of the Scriptorium and other key works done in the acknowledgments. There were obviously words that were left out for one reason and another and the workers were not always compensated or praised well enough. And yet, despite its flaws, in the Oxford dictionary we have a wonderful connection to our language that will continue to have an impact on us.

The suffrage for women’s right to vote, the social pressure to release one’s “lie-child” quietly, and the effects of “The Great War” weigh heavily on the characters, and can make this historic fiction seem a depressing/sad/unfair affair. And that is also true. We shouldn’t avoid the difficult or uncomfortable realities of our past. We can’t redo history, so we must face the future with a determination to learn and strive to better our fellow man/woman. We also must face the fact we will never do it perfectly, especially when judged from the perspective of our future generations.

Consider Esme & Lizzie’s relationship. In what ways are the women similar? How are they different? Consider the extent to which nature/nurture shapes their expectations and behaviours.

Both women have an interest and care for people. That looks different in how they act, but the intent is genuine. Lizzie looks after Esme and the Murray house with an energetic efficiency and diligence. She cares for Mabel, despite not approving of her language and behaviour. She helps Esme especially in the most difficult stages of her life.

Esme is fascinated by people and wants to know about them. She records the meaning of the words that they have to share, preserving their knowledge and character. Both women preserve things that mean a lot to them.

Lizzie is bereft of both her parents and served full time as a maid from a young age. Her mother was in servitude it seems, and so she knows little else. She is a Catholic or Protestant Christian and her understanding of morality guides much of what she does.

Esme is a free spirit, at least when she isn’t subjected to boarding school horror or shame from her pregnancy. The loss of her mother at an early age makes her seek for the comfort and protection of Lizzie and Ms. Thompson, though she doesn’t always appreciate their guidance. She loves discussing words with her dad and learns a lot about the process of the dictionary. Her role in it grows over time. Her hopes and expectations fluctuate, depending on her situation, and still needs the support of others.

Did reading the book impact your mood? If yes, how so?

I think appreciation for the hardships and triumphs of the characters and the times stood out for me. I feel for them. Life can be very unfair or difficult, but it helps us think of why we do things carefully. We can be sympathetic to those hard done by, and it makes us better people if we persevere. I’m not sure my mood was too affected. I certainly felt like cheering when Lizzie made friends and Esme got married.

What surprised you about the book?

I guess I was surprised at the length of time it took to produce the dictionary. Seventy years is a long time, but so is Bible translation, which can take many years, with many people working together. To do it solo would be a huge undertaking.

Can the evolution of language ever be a bad thing?

In keeping with the spirit of the book, you can lose the original meaning of a word, and in that sense, it’s impact. One generation might seriously depart from the language of their parents or grandparents, making communication difficult or impossible. Sometimes this happens by force when a country adopts a new language and teaches it in schools, to harmonize with all areas of their domain. The people left out are the illiterate or elderly.

If you could ask the author anything, what would it be?

What dictionary, if any, do you use? What’s your favourite word that few use?

How does the book’s title work in relation to the book’s contents? If you could give the book a new title, what would it be?

It works. It entices a potential reader to wonder what words have been lost. We could call it my wife’s suggestion – “A-Z”.

?Questions¿ – ‘Eggshell Skull’ by Bri Lee

Eggshell Skull by Bri Lee is an insider’s look into the Australian justice system, along with her efforts to have a man convicted for crimes against her. It is written with raw passion and eye-opening clarity.

This was my book-club read for May, and I have 12 standard questions to help me parse out my thoughts. I may add some of my own to finish.

1. What was you initial reaction to the book? Did it hook you immediately, or take some time to get into?

I started reading with interest, but quickly found it was an emotionally-tough read, and had to take a break. The book deals with Lee’s year as a judge’s associate*, hearing both mundane and profane cases, including many of children and women’s sexual abuse by men. She is a self-prescribed “furious feminist”, but I can’t see how anyone can’t be affected from these stories. I also found myself disagreeing with her on points, but realized that she had reasons to what she said.

*Their role is to work with the judge and manage case paperwork and court bookings, but also is eye-witness to all the hearings/cases the judge presides over.

2. Do you think the story was plot-based or character driven?

The question of the book is whether Bri is going to get justice for abuse she received as a child, but ultimately this is about her experience and she is a driving force for the story.

3. What was your favourite quote/passage?

I quoted from this book at my Bible study, where Bri has her victim statement read in court and she says of the guilty, “I do not want to read this letter aloud in court because I do not want Mr Levins to understand the particulars of the pain he has caused me, as his actions over the past two years have sufficiently convinced me that he is the kind of man who might appreciate hearing details of my suffering. I only wish to convey that I understand how severe many matters are that pass through the District Court, and that although the facts of Mr Levin’s offending were not nearly as severe as many, they have had a severs impact on my life. It is not for Mr Levins to decide how serious his offending was. In our legal system defendants must ‘take their victims as they find them’.”

I find this telling, that some people will only take pleasure in other’s suffering, and also that a person’s suffering doesn’t have to come from a severe action, it could be anything. Saying that, child abuse is terribly serious still.

4. What made the setting unique or important? Could the story have taken place anywhere?

Lee’s year as an associate was extremely valuable for me as a reader. It showed how difficult it is to get any form of justice in a human system. Lee is strong in her criticism of the justice system in Australia, especially in how the victims have to go through so much to see their cases seen and for them to be vindicated. She is particularly moved by sexual crimes, most committed by male perpetrators, who she often refers to as ‘monsters’.

As I read this book, I found myself thinking about my experience as a juror, and all the feelings and beliefs that came out of my time. I enjoyed the descriptions of court rooms she gave, as they reminded me being in one.

5. Did you pick out any themes throughout the book?

It’s a heart-cry to all victims of crimes to seek justice, or at least to know that someone cares. Lee encourages people to tell someone they trust about injustices done to them. It is also a call on people to think twice about their actions and how it could affect those around them.

7. How credible/believable did you find the narrator to be? Did you feel like you got the ‘true story’?

Lee is a credible narrator and tells things how they happened, or appear to have happened. She records a lot of conversations, so I wonder if she is naturally a note-taker or she has an amazing memory. She makes notes in court, so it’s possible. The other option is that she is re-creating those convos so we can follow her thought process and story. It’s told from Lee’s perspective, and we hear her thoughts alone, so there is very much a bias.

8. How did the characters change throughout the story? How did your opinion of them change?

Lee is in a bad state at the start of the book, self-harming, self-vomiting and other negative behaviour. As she opens up about her abuse and hears from other people about their own abuse, Lee feels less controlled by her past. She is able to see that her story is not unique and doesn’t have to beat herself up about what happened to her. She treats herself better in quite a few ways, speaking about herself with positive language, less self-harm, etc.

I had some initial reactions of not especially liking her language and behaviour in general and about men. Yet I realized that these things were a response to what she saw as unjust and unfair around her. So I can empathize a bit more, especially having my wife, H, give her perspective of Lee’s situation. We have options in how we respond to the things that happen to us, and it can be hard to be wise and heal well.

9. How did the structure of the book affect the story?

It’s mostly written in a linear fashion, and so we do not find out the result of her case against Levins until the end. This meant I had to slog through quite a lot of cases during her time as judge’s associate, which were very unpleasant. That being said, we get to feel the frustration she felt about the length of the two-year process.

10. Which character did you relate to the most, and what was it about them that you connected with?

I did not really relate to anyone, really. I have had moments of fierce anger at injustice, like Lee. I do hate domestic violence and sexual exploitation. So I can relate in part to her. I did put myself in the shoes of the defendant, as I am guilty of sexual behaviour that has had a lasting effect on me and my family. I have been fully honest, regretful and seeking to make amends, which differs from Levin’s behaviour, who fought for freedom over truth. But I did consider what being accused might be like and what I would do in his shoes. I think we can all be capable of committing grave deeds. We can lie, mistreat and take advantage, without batting an eyelid. As one person at book-club put it, “We all have two sides to us, good and bad.” Should men be made out to be monsters? The things they do can definitely be monstrous, and the same for women, too.

11. How did you feel about the ending? What did you like, what did you not like, and what do you wish had been different?

The climax of Lee’s story is near the end, so the follow-up to the case feels like a small add-on. Regardless, it was her book and she had every right to keep whatever she wanted about the after-math to herself.

12. Did the book change your opinion or perspective about anything? Do you feel different now than you did before you read it?

This book reminded me of the fact that no human justice system will be perfect. It will either be too harsh or too lenient, the guilty might walk free and the innocent could be further victimized from the experience or be jailed themselves. I would not want to be a judge, lawyer or anyone involved with the system. Regardless, I am grateful for the perspective Lee brought and am more empathetic to people like her. Another perspective I listen to is H’s sister, J, who works at reintegrating offenders to normal life, and these include drug users, Family Domestic Violence Offenders, rapists, mentally ill offenders, and so on. Some deny everything or defend themselves. J has fellow workers who face FDV in their own situations, which makes their job with prisoners a difficult one. Work is being done to retrain the brain for good behaviour, housing is applied for, with Centrelink support and job possibilities. J is positive that some people can learn to better themself and do better for their families, but it seems that there are far more who won’t ever listen or change. So Levin might never change, despite having been taken to court.

13. What would Jesus say to / about Bri?

Jesus calls little children to come to Him when his disciples where turning them away. He wants everyone to come to Him like little children, full of faith that He can do what He promises to do: Heal them, make them His own, forgive and restore them, and avenge those who caused them pain or tempted them to do evil. He might say, “You matter, Bri. You are valued and so does what happened to you. The deed was horrific and Levin’s behaviour controlling and reprehensible. Don’t seek revenge; God will avenge. Stand up for others, fight for justice for them. And Bri, God’s children do mess up, a lot. Yet I call them each day to doing what is right and I gave them my Spirit to change their heart to love what I love. I will come again to call all people, living and dead, to account, including you. See me while I may be found and you will have peace.”

5 Questions – “15 Seconds of Brave” by Melissa Doyle

It’s time for another book-club review, and this is of 8 stories shared by Channel 7 news reporter, Mel Doyle. Written during the COVID lockdowns in Australia, 15 Seconds of Brave tells of eight people who faced/are facing life-affecting situations and how they are coping and thriving. There are stories that speak of time through wars, personal battles of mental health, the loss of loved ones, and physical pain. While each person should have a book to themselves, as some do, this book was written to help others find the same healing or strength to persevere like those interviewed. For this review, I’ve got five questions from the book-club to help me in collecting my thoughts.

1. What life lesson can be learned from the stories in this book?

No matter what life throws at you, there is some way to live on in some hope of the future or at least in the good of the present. We might never face what these people and their families have gone through, and God-willing we won’t, but their stories are testament to the resilience we can find within and from the support of others. Someone I follow online shares from his life of clinical depression how his first doctor told him everyone recovers from the disease; the only ones who don’t are the ones who give up. Suffering is never pleasant or easy to bear, but to live through it and be healthy and free helps us be of good to others too. Many people in the book have a new-found empathy for others like them, and reach out in different ways.

2. What was the motivation for the writing of this book?

While part of it appears to be for the writers own sake, as she says “I initially considered writing a book about resilience for personal reasons”, COVID19 affected everyone, and Mel wanted to publicize stories showing internal strength in light of tragedy.

3. What part of the book inspired you in some way?

Each story had it’s moments where I felt encouraged in the way the person pushed past the negative options of giving up, choosing revenge, or suppressing emotion. Those can be all tempting in their own way. They are reactive and speak to our desire to quickly or easily deal with our hurt. And yet they are negative because they only cause further hurt, for us and others. The harder choice we have are to reach out to others for help, find a peace or acceptance in the new normal, and forgive others and ourselves. Grace’s journey from being a kidnap victim of the Lord’s Resistance Army to an advocate for other survivors, was particularly inspiring. To be able to keep living and fighting despite the daily threats to her life is remarkable. The forgiveness required in Danny and Leila’s story was beyond anything I have even needed to give or fathom. They faced the horrifying reality of losing three of their kids and a niece to a drunk driver’s dash to the shops. Two days later, Leila stood at the site of the accident, in front of the nation’s TV cameras and said, “I think in my heart I forgive him.” Man, what a terrible thing to happen, and what a wonder that she was able to say those words. Words escape me.

4. Did this book change you life in a positive way or negative way?

It’s one more confirmation that we can move on from pain in positive ways, and not live in depressive, destructive ways. I know that from my own life, having come out of a dark cycle of porn, horrible guilt and self-hate, and people-pleasing, into accepting freedom and love from family, friends and my Father in Heaven. I found it so freeing to be honest about my past. It’s why I’m able to share it here.

5. Was there a particular story you could relate to or enjoyed more than the others?

I related to Juli’s addictive struggle to an extent. In a sense we’ve all self-medicated with food, entertainment, drugs, sex, etc. to cope with things we don’t want to face. Enjoy is not really the word, but I empathized most with Danny and Leila. Christ tells us to forgive others, because we have ourselves been forgiven by our Father for all the hurt and evil we have done to Him. Oh the love and blessing He pours out on us!

So reach out. There’s bound to be someone willing to listen, empathize, sit with you, and send you in the right direction for healing.

12 Questions – “Pride & Prejudice” by Jane Austen      

Since my now wife and I reconnected nearly 4 years ago, I have been getting into the books that have been part of her life. One of the sets of books I have read from are the Jane Austen novels. Having watched the movies, but never read the books, it was high time I enjoyed them too. I’ve read Persuasion, Sense & Sensibility, and now Pride & Prejudice. The copy that H offered me is labeled an “Insight Edition”, which has notes and thoughts of editors on the margins to inform and entertain. Along with these, it has some questions to encourage conversations or thoughts. And so I’m going to use them as a way to review this book. Enjoy! Warning: Spoilers aplenty.

1. Would you marry a person who you didn’t love but who was rich beyond compare and could fulfill all your dreams and wishes? Do you think Charlotte Lucas made the right choice in her situation?

I have never wanted to be rich, although compared to Jane Austen standards, I’m probably fairly wealthy. I always wanted a companion in a wife who I could see eye to eye with and build a life together that serves others and honours God. And by God’s grace, I’ve found those things with H. In regards to Charlotte, I feel she is sacrificing her long-term joy for a financial security that did not promise much beyond that. Collins is a character who is sickeningly differential to his patroness Lady Catherine De Bough, and boasts to all of her wealth and “condescension”, as he calls it, to take an interest in him. His boasting of his position and thoughtlessness of others’ feelings would wear on his relationship to Charlotte. At the same time, she seeks to make her life tolerable by seeing as little of him as possible. I can’t blame her for that, poor girl.

2. Who is more in the wrong at the beginning of the novel: Darcy for his haughty aloofness or Elizabeth for her quick judgment of Darcy and Wickham?

It really depends on one’s distaste of either folly. To me, both are pretty damnable in myself. I would hate to come across as aloof. I have my moments, though, I’m sure. It usually comes from a place of feeling uncomfortable or embarrassed about being in a social setting where I know few people. But I’ve found the best thing to do is to sit down and chat with a fellow party-goer, and make a connection. So if Darcy could have humbled himself and chatted with Elizabeth, much pain could have been avoided. Elizabeth is guilty of jumping to assertions from Wickham that are in line with a prejudice that she quickly develops of Darcy. It doesn’t help that she immediately fancies Wickham a little. It is easy to believe people whom you like over those you don’t. I’ve found the best thing is to hope for the best in people, as Jane and Mrs. Gardiner tend to do, until the alternative proves itself true. As Proverbs so wisely puts it: The first one to plead his cause seems right, until his neighbor comes and examines him. (Bible Hub – NKJV, Prov 18:17)

3. Do you think first impressions are important or overrated? Have you ever had a first impression of someone that turned out to be dead-on? Have you ever been wrong about a person after your first meeting, and how did you come to realize that?

We are bound to have first impressions of people. The challenge is to avoid letting that cloud how we treat them from then on. We are fickle people, us humans; we have different feelings affecting our behaviour all the time. So I don’t think we should sum someone up by how they behave on our first meeting with them. Treat people how they want to be treated, with respect and love, and you might find they improve on further acquaintance. One of my friends, Auntie P, is married to Uncle T. I first met Auntie P, and most of what I heard about Uncle T was from her. They have four young boys, and she mostly talked about her struggles with raising them, both here and in her home country. She complained a lot to my mum about Uncle T, and how he “hid” from the boys when he got home from work, avoiding the responsibilities, apparently. This formed an idea in my head about Uncle T, before I even met him. She told me some amazing stories, as well, about his help and support to her when she was in need, so it wasn’t all negative. When I finally met Uncle T, I really liked him. He is a thoughtful and calm man, generous and nice to be around. So hearing about someone, and finally meeting them balances the scales, I find. Everyone has strengths and weaknesses that are not apparent the first time we meet them, and it’s worth taking the time to see the whole person before we pass judgment. We would hope they would do the same for us, wouldn’t we?

4. Obviously, Elizabeth and Darcy are beloved characters, but which smaller character is closest to your heart? Mr. Bennet? Jane? Mrs. Gardiner? Mr. Bingley?

It’s hard to find a favourite in the other characters, but for me, I think I feel and rejoice most for Jane. She’s a quiet, unassuming, good girl. Jane is an ideal older sister and daughter, attentive, caring and hopeful. And so the tragedy of losing Mr. Bingley to London due to the anxious concern of his friend Darcy and designs of his sisters is heartbreaking. Why do the bad guys (or girls) triumph? And yet, the pain she goes through is readily put aside when Mr. Bingley returns with Darcy’s blessing and a proposal. The eventual justice of this turnaround is truly glorious and fulfilling. As Mr. Bennet says, with all the joy of the reader following along with him, “You are a good girl, and I have great pleasure thinking you will be so happily settled. I have not a doubt of your doing very well together.”

5. Which movie versions have you seen and how do they compare to the world Austen creates? Which actresses and actors embody the characters best?

I grew up with the A&E miniseries. It is so well acted and directed, that it will always be my favourite, though I think the 2005 version with Kiera Knightly has it’s good moments, especially making it motion film length. Both versions help paint the world of Austen pretty well. I started rewatching the miniseries while about halfway through the book, so the book and big-screen versions blend a bit!

I think Jennifer Ehle plays Elizabeth very well, and she is a character who has to go through the gamut of emotions, from indifference, rage, despair, to hope & rapturous joy. The actors for Mr. Collins and Catherine De Bough are wonderful in their portrayal of these cringe-worthy and sometimes despicable characters.

6. Have you ever gone to Mrs. Bennet’s lengths (ie., sending Jane on horseback in the rain to Netherfield) to secure a match for someone or even for yourself? What were the consequences?

I fell in love with someone while away on a fundraising trip to Lebanon. She lived in Sydney and I live in Perth. She did not reciprocate my feelings, and yet I still wanted to visit her to at least talk it out. She took my trip as a confirmation of my feelings and avoided me like the plague. I still took the flight to visit other friends, including others from the Lebanese trip. That was a case of unrequited love, for sure. And yet I got over it, and ended up with someone to whom I’m much better suited, right, H?

7. A young unmarried woman today won’t become destitute without a man, but marriage continues to loom as an expectation. What pressures does marriage put on women today? Are the pressures of dating any different? What pressures do marriage and dating put on men, and are they different from the pressures women face?

From listening to my wife, one of the pressures she faces is the questions from well-meaning, unthinking people who want to know if she is going to have children soon. This question and others like it were sometimes posed before she was even married. I certainly was and am asked this question, but it’s not a burden for me. She could probably answer this question better than I. The pressure for men is probably about performing. Being a good earner/boyfriend/kisser/reader-of-minds. I never really felt much pressure, myself. I was never pressured to get married by family or friends or to be someone I’m not with H.

8. How would Elizabeth Bennet (and even Jane Austen) fare in today’s society?

Miss Bennet is very secure in herself. She probably would do better in life than most of us, who are very reliant on acceptance by society. Of course one of her family was seduced by despicable Wickham, and Lizzy vulnerable to the social fallout from that union. She is fairly level-headed and not afraid of people, things I aspire to be more like. Miss Austen could carry herself in our society by wit alone, I dare say.

9. Darcy is often held up as the greatest romantic hero of all fiction. Do you agree? If you could change one thing about him, what would it be?

I don’t disagree, although I do have a soft spot for Aragon & Arwen. That being said, it is Arwen who sacrifices more for their love. Darcy has many good qualities; he’s a good friend, a generous benefactor, a decent wooer, when he actually tries.

10. Do you think Lydia Bennet is cruel or just immature? What do you think will come of her marriage to Wickham?

She is a little cruel to Jane, and she does boast something terrible about being the first married in front of all her sisters. What’s ironic is she’s unaware of all the trouble she’s given so many people because of her actions. It will become clear to Lydia that Wickham cares only for himself and the luster of being with him will fade. If they stick together, it would be simply for money’s sake, and they would probably live their own lives as they pleased.

11. Who in the novel lives the most authentic Christian faith?

I say Jane is most like what Christians ought to be, with some caveats. She is too trusting of people’s characters, while Lizzy is too distrustful. However, she’s more discerning in time, and rounds up her storyline quite the wisest and most harmless of Austen’s P& P characters. We live in hope as Christians, and while Jane’s is pertaining to a certain Mr. Bingley, her overall desire is to hope for her family and for the best of others. The care she gives her younger cousins speaks to my heart for kids, too.

12. Have you or someone you know had to deal with an “embarrassing” family as Elizabeth and Jane do? Does staying loyal to family mean accepting their behavior? Should Elizabeth and Jane have acted differently?

I have a wonderful family, though we certainly have our moments. Does accepting bad behaviour mean allowing or agreeing with it? I confess I’m passive aggressive, if not just passive, when it comes to difficult topics in the family. When the time comes, though, to confront someone for their behaviour, I do try to tell the truth about how it makes me and possibly the rest of the family feel. Elizabeth and Jane bear a lot of things for the sake of their silly family. Elizabeth does speak up regarding Lydia when she wants to follow the regiment to Brighton, regaling her father with what she thinks of her character. So they are not silent sufferers. Everyone bears responsibility for their behaviour, but it’s also a family’s/church family’s role to bring wise counsel to the front when needed.

And that concludes the 12 questions and my 12 answers.

10 Questions – ‘The Happiest Refugee’ by Anh Do

I’m part of a book club this year and our first read was The Happiest Refugee, by Vietnamese/Australian comedian, Anh Do. We were given ten questions to mull over after reading the book, and I thought of sharing my thoughts here.

  1. Did you admire or detest this person? Why?

    It’s impossible for me to detest Anh. He has been through so much and has such a strong work ethic and compassion for others, values that Aussies (including me) admire greatly. I had seen Anh in one or two of his shows on TV, back when I watched TV(!), but this book helped me value the person he is. With him coming from a Catholic background I felt some connection to him, being a Christian.

    2. What life lesson can be learned from this event or story?

    Love your family and community with faithfulness and compassion. This is made clear in how much Anh’s father heroically stood up and gave for his family while he was able to, and how Anh’s mum allowed people to stay with them, even though they themselves were dirt-poor. Anh carried on this legacy by supporting his mum and charities.

    Work hard for everything in life. The story follows the family as they flee communist Vietnam and gain asylum in Australia. Discovering the freedom and opportunities in Australia, the whole family work their butts off to produce clothes, invest in property, own and sell animals and their products, etc. At no point can they let up to laze about in their PJs. And yet they get to enjoy the fruit of their efforts. I admired how Anh worked up to getting a job in a law firm (although he knew he’d hate the job) for the sake of providing for his mum. That’s dedication.

    3. Did the book read like a story, a newspaper article, a report, something else? Give examples.

    This book is clearly a memoir of the life of a family and the writer’s journey to becoming a standup comedian. Each chapter is broken up into little moments and stories from their life. The gripping escape from Vietnam is a highlight, but so is the telling of how they ended up on a farm, raising ducks for their eggs, and losing it all through one unfortunate decision and a property market crash.

    4. What one new fact did you learn from reading this book?

    Nothing really stands out to me. I mostly was engaged in the emotion of the story.

    5. What was the motivation for the writing of this book?

    I believe to was to honour the writers family and to show that one can move on from tragic and difficult situations and be able to forgive, work hard and achieve much if they have the help they need.

    6. Did you feel this book truly belonged in the nonfiction genre?

    Well, it might be hard to believe some of the stories Anh’s dad told of daring rescues and catching grasshoppers, but I believe these are all part of a true-to-life portrayal of Anh’s family.

    7. Was the point of the book to share an opinion, explain a topic, tell about a personal journey, or something else? Did the author do it well?

    It’s Anh’s personal journey from infancy, up to his marriage and re-connection with his father. It’s a grand tale, with many little moments of interest.

    8. What part of this book inspired you in some way? Explain.

    When Anh and Koh, his brother, helped put together money with their mum to buy industrial sewing machines. The selflessness of that section was inspiring because I need to be reminded what my parents have sacrificed for me and to respond in like for them.

    Anh’s efforts to reconnect his brother and sister to his estranged dad resulted in grace, forgiveness and the ability to move on from hatred or bitterness. I found that particularly encouraging and heart-warming.

    9. Will you read other books by this author? Why or why not?

    I’d have to find out what he’s written. He does weave a wonderful story.

    10. Did this book change your life in a positive or negative way? Explain.

    Not particularly. It did help me appreciate what it might be like being on an overflowing fishing boat, being raided by pirates, and having little hope of survival. And for that, I’m grateful. ‘The Grateful West Aussie.’

    The Main(freight) Difference

    I was behind a Mainfreight truck yesterday and was struck by some wording on the back – “Always keep your word.” Initially, before doing any research, I though this was a quote that the company had adopted as a whole. Having done some research, it seems they allow the driver to choose a quote (article from Radio New Zealand) that they like or means something to them. And this quote struck me as different, and I was inspired by it and tried to live it out in my work.

    Looking on the Mainfreight website, they are striving to stick to three core values: Culture, Family, and Philosophy. I thought that I’d share their list of examples of how one might follow through with them.

    It has made me pause and think about my own core values, and whether I’m implementing them into the way I run my painting company. Do I really care about living out my faith, and do I remind myself of the man I want to be; the business owner I want to be? What do I want my Main(freight) Difference to be?